ReviewPsychiatry and clinical neurosciences2026
Overall quality of life and emotional regulation among inmates: A narrative review.
Review in Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although there is a plethora of studies related to quality of life (QoL), little is known about QoL in prison settings. Emotions and difficulties in emotional regulation in incarcerated individuals may affect inmates' QoL and also their ability to reintegrate into society. The purpose of this review was to compile the empirical evidence and identify knowledge gaps to make suggestions for enhancing QoL in correctional environments. This narrative review includes research published between 2014 and 2024 in PubMed, Google Scholar, EBSCO, and Embase on inmates' QoL, emotion regulation, and mental health. Research on forensic patients as well as non-English articles was excluded. Emotions and emotion regulation were interlinked with mental health issues, while social support was the most eminent feature promoting overall QoL in prisoners, along with other systemic and environmental aspects. Our narrative review suggests that the research to date is limited, focused on male and young inmates, and based on self-reported cross-sectional data. From a public health perspective, identifying the impact of emotions and mental health in the prison population could help improve the QoL of prisoners and inform research, rehabilitation programs, and correctional policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.