ArticleJournal of stroke2026
Does the Benefit of Thrombectomy in Large Strokes Depend on Perfusion-Diffusion Mismatch? A Large Stroke Therapy Evaluation Trial Post Hoc Analysis.
Article in Journal of stroke, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeWhether perfusion-diffusion mismatch modifies treatment effect of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large strokes is poorly known. To address this question, we conducted a post hoc secondary analysis of the Large Stroke Therapy Evaluation (LASTE) randomized controlled trial (RCT).
methodsThe LASTE RCT compared MT plus best medical treatment (BMT) to BMT alone in patients with large infarct (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score 0-5) in the 0-7-hour timewindow. This secondary analysis was restricted to patients with available baseline MR perfusionweighted imaging. We investigated the potential heterogeneity of MT treatment according to the presence of perfusion-diffusion mismatch, defined as a mismatch ratio ≥1.2, calculated as the time-to-maximum >6 seconds cerebral volume divided by ischemic core volume. The primary outcome was better functional outcome (favorable shift in the distribution of modified Rankin Scale [mRS] at 90 days, analyzed using generalized odds ratio [GenOR]).
resultsA total of 102/324 patients were included, among whom 55 (54%) had a perfusiondiffusion mismatch. No significant treatment effect heterogeneity by diffusion-perfusion mismatch was observed for the primary outcome (GenOR for better functional outcome: 1.70 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.95 to 3.05] and 1.04 [95% CI, 0.57 to 1.87] in patients with and without mismatch, respectively; ratio of GenORs: 1.63 [95% CI, 0.71 to 3.74]; P for heterogeneity=0.24) or for the secondary efficacy and safety outcomes.
conclusionsOur study found no evidence of heterogeneity of treatment effect with respect to benefit or safety in patients with unrestricted infarct size at baseline treated with MT by presence of perfusion-diffusion mismatch. An individual participant-data meta-analysis of RCT is needed for definitive conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.