ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2026
Microbial Communities Powering Plant-Microbial Fuel Cells: Diversity, Functions and Biotechnological Perspectives.
Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microbial Communities Powering Plant-Microbial Fuel Cells: Diversity, Functions and Biotechnological Perspectives.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The pressing challenges posed by climate change and the depletion of traditional energy sources have intensified the search for alternative energy-harvesting technologies. Plant-microbial fuel cells (PMFCs) have emerged as a promising solution. Although they are not yet energetically competitive, their potential application in low-power devices as a battery replacement has been widely explored. PMFCs operate by integrating living plants with microbial fuel cells to generate electricity in situ through the metabolic activity of electroactive microorganisms (EAMs) in the rhizosphere. These microbes degrade root exudates and play a central role in PMFC performance and long-term stability. In this review, we selected 21 studies that examined bacterial and archaeal communities in PMFCs, comparing their microbial composition and resulting electricity outputs. We highlight how differences in plant species, system configurations, and environmental conditions influence the structure and function of microbial communities. We also discuss the methods used for microbial community assessment and address the persistent lack of standardisation across studies, which limits comparability. Finally, we outline future research directions aimed at optimising PMFC performance, including the search for electroactivity biomarkers, the potential of genetic engineering and nanomaterials, and the largely unexplored electroactive potential of eukaryotes in these systems. This review advances the existing literature by incorporating recent findings and offering a renewed perspective on PMFC systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.