ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a limited learning curve for ligament balancing.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) aims to improve implant positioning and soft tissue balance, but few studies have evaluated the learning curve (LC) for intraoperative ligament balancing.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 234 posterior-stabilized RA-TKAs performed by three surgeons with varying prior experience using the MAKO system. The primary endpoint was the learning curve duration for mastering ligament balancing, classified as perfectly balanced, stable, or unstable based on medial and lateral joint line openings in extension and flexion. Learning curves for ligament balancing and operative time were assessed using LC-CUSUM analysis.
resultsOverall, 79.8% of TKAs were perfectly balanced, 19.1% stable, and 1.1% unstable. The LC for overall ligament balancing ranged from 5 to 9 cases depending on the surgeon. Operative time normalized after 12 to 22 cases, shorter for surgeons with prior navigation experience. Complications were minimal, with no early infections and few mechanical issues.
conclusionsOptimal ligament balancing with RA-TKA is achieved rapidly and remains stable, with operative times comparable to conventional techniques after the LC. Prior experience with navigation-assisted surgery shortens the LC. These findings support the reproducibility and safety of robotic ligament balancing, though further studies are needed to confirm long-term clinical benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41656478What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.