Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41656477›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026

Cardiac MR function analysis with DL-based super resolution reconstruction: application in the clinical setting.

Franziska Adomat, Christof Schaub, Tobias Hoh, Xenia Fischer, Roman Guggenberger, Robert Manka, Matthias Eberhard, Lucas Weber

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Franziska AdomatDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland. franziska.adomat@ksw.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4601-1875
Christof SchaubDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8289-7274
Tobias HohMR Clinical Science, Philips AG, Horgen, Switzerland.
Xenia FischerOffice for Sport and Health Promotion, Health Department of the Canton of Zug, Steinhausen, Switzerland.
Roman GuggenbergerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5903-2248
Robert MankaDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3383-4998
Matthias EberhardInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lucas WeberDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess differences in volumetry, image quality and acquisition time between balanced steady-state free precession cine sequences acquired using (a) a standardized sensitivity encoding (SENSE) approach and (b) deep learning-based super-resolution reconstruction based on high-resolution images acquired with compressed sensitivity encoding (C-SENSE). We retrospectively evaluated 31 consecutive patients (mean age 61.2 ± 13.1 years, 26% female (8/31) and 74% male (23/31)) undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations to assess for the presence of ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. Cine images were acquired using a 1.5T Philips Ingenia MRI scanner, with classic parallel imaging (SENSE) and compressed sensing (C-SENSE) accelerated acquisition techniques (R = 2 and R = 4, respectively). C-SENSE datasets were reconstructed using a deep learning-based denoising and super-resolution algorithm to enhance image resolution and quality (CS-SR). To evaluate cardiac function, manual left ventricular (LV) segmentation and volumetric analysis were performed on both datasets by two readers, who were blinded to the clinical data. Image quality was rated independently by three readers using Likert scales. Correlation between SENSE and CS-SR datasets with respect to LV volumetry was high (r = 0.98-1.00), with no significant differences found for end-diastolic volume (mean difference 0.04 ml, limits of agreement (LoA) -11.19 to 11.26 ml; p = 0.970) or end-systolic volume (mean difference 1.60 ml, LoA - 7.48 to 10.68 ml; p = 0.064). Overall subjective image quality was comparable (p = 0.061), with CS-SR offering better image sharpness at the cost of increased artifacts (p < 0.001 respectively). Image acquisition time was significantly accelerated with C-SENSE acquisition (SENSE: 411.1 ± 47.7 s, C-SENSE: 165.6 ± 21.5 s; p < 0.001). CS-SR shows promise in streamlining routine cardiac imaging by significantly shortening acquisition times, without impairing LV volumetric analysis, while preserving overall image quality and resolution.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineVentricular Function, LeftAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesStroke VolumeCardiac MRICine imagingCompressed SENSEDeep learningReconstruction algorithmSuper-Resolution

Identifiers

PMID41656477
PMCPMC13136214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.