ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
Non-invasive assessment of plaque characteristics in diffuse and focal coronary artery disease; plaque vulnerability and high-risk features.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies have suggested that focal and diffuse atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) have significantly different plaque composition, treatment efficacy and outcomes. In this study, we aimed to investigate the plaque characteristics of diffuse and focal lesions in patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for the assessment of obstructive CAD. Patients with CAD-RADS score ≥ 2 were retrospectively reviewed. Plaque characteristics, composition and high-risk features were assessed. Plaques ≥ 20 mm or ≥ 25% of total vessel length were accepted as diffuse lesions and otherwise focal lesions. CCTA-derived plaque features and lesion-oriented cardiac outcomes were compared. After the exclusion of ineligible patients, 597 lesions of 441 patients were evaluated. The mean age of the study population was 55 ± 9,4 years. There were 463 focal lesions and 134 diffuse lesions. Diffuse lesions demonstrated higher calcification (p:0.001). CCTA-derived high-risk features, including spotty calcification (p:0.001), low-attenuation plaque (p: 0.041) and positive remodeling (p: 0.016), were more prevalent in focal disease. In addition, high-risk plaque was also higher in focal lesions(p: 0.022). Moreover, lesions with ≥ 70% plaque burden were significantly higher in focal lesions (p:0.044). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that plaque burden ≥ 70% and CCTA-derived high-risk plaque were independently associated with cardiac outcomes. During the follow-up, lesion-oriented myocardial infarction and revascularization were higher in diffuse disease (p < 0.001 and p:0.015, respectively). Diffuse and focal atherosclerotic lesions demonstrate significant differences regarding plaque vulnerability. Moreover, diffuse plaques have a worse prognosis compared to focal lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41656476What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.