ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2026
Methodologies for Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Target-Site Drug Exposure: A Narrative Review of Current Strategies.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ciprofloxacin beyond antibacterial therapy: pharmacological mechanisms, anticancer activity, and translational limitations.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD) for Analgesics: Review of Applications, Regulatory Integration, and Emerging Directions.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- LAFOV PET as an enabling platform for pharmacokinetics-informed digital twins.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) is increasingly used to guide drug dosing based on population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models developed mainly using plasma concentration data. However, plasma levels may not always correlate well with drug concentrations at the site of action, potentially leading to under- or overestimation of target-site exposure. It is, therefore, important to evaluate which popPK modeling approaches effectively describe drug concentrations at target sites other than plasma to support the selection and implementation of appropriate modeling techniques. This review outlines four general modeling strategies described in literature characterizing the relationship between plasma and target-site drug concentrations. The first approach includes rate constants describing inflow and outflow, which is especially useful for unidirectional transport or large flow rate differences. Second, intercompartmental clearance models capture bidirectional transport with a single parameter that is directly comparable with elimination clearance or blood flow. Third, effect compartment models are used to describe delayed tissue distribution. Lastly, the target site can be modeled as part of either the central or the peripheral compartment. Although therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) based on target-site concentrations has been suggested, implementation is limited by invasive sampling procedures, limited sample volumes, and the lack of established pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets. Nevertheless, even small differences in target-site exposure can result in clinical implications, and the applicability of drug monitoring using target-site concentrations has been shown in critically ill patients. In conclusion, target-site concentrations have been successfully predicted using different modeling methodologies and have demonstrated potential to optimize therapy in select clinical cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.