Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41656451›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Age estimation of unaccompanied migrant adolescents for judicial purposes: a bayesian approach.

Henri Caussinus, Patrick Chariot

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Henri CaussinusInstitute of Mathematics (UMR5219), Université Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Patrick ChariotDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bobigny, 93007, France. patrick.chariot@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5556-8814

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Judicial authorities are increasingly concerned by determining the age of unaccompanied adolescents or young adults under suspicion. When other approaches are considered insufficient, courts demand appropriate medical tests. Part of those tests aim at determining the civil age through skeletal age. However, this determination is subject to a large uncertainty and it is difficult to assess its amount of accuracy. To a large extent the problem is statistical and the previous statistical proposals suffer from serious drawbacks. For instance, they rest, at least partially, on assumptions or conventions rather than actual data or use the name of Bayes without implementing a genuine Bayesian procedure. Instead, we present an actual Bayesian procedure resting not only on reference data (as all previous proposals) but also on data that permit to estimate the age distribution of the subjects submitted to examination in a given context. The method provides estimates of the civil age with their precision under the form of a probability density. It is ethic since it estimates the global behaviour of the examined subjects without prejudging anything about it (e.g. with respect to the alleged age). The method is illustrated by a real-life case (data gathered in the Department of Forensic Medicine, Jean-Verdier Hospital, Bondy, France, from 2017 to 2020). We used data from hand/wrist radiographs but the presented approach could be applied to data from any other anatomical site.

Indexed as

Age Determination by SkeletonTransients and MigrantsUnaccompanied MinorsAdolescentBayes TheoremCarpal BonesFemaleFranceHand BonesHumansMaleBayesian statistical procedureChronological ageCredibility intervalsSkeletal ageUnaccompanied migrant adolescent

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.