ArticleHealth economics review2026
The feasibility of social impact bonds in financing tertiary health care quality: qualitative stakeholders' perspectives in Kenya.
Article in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing demand for high-quality healthcare and the persistent limited funding against the growing need for universal health coverage across African health systems has ignited interest in innovative financing models. Social Impact Bonds (SIBs) are becoming an alternative financing mechanism due to their ability to attract private investments through outcome-based funding. However, there’s low adoption of SIB health financing in the African context, calling for empirical evidence on its feasibility. Kenya’s public health sector is undergoing reforms to complement traditional funding with innovative instruments such as SIBs to improve tertiary healthcare quality. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis qualitative study explored the perspectives of 55 key stakeholders—including Ministry of Health and National Treasury policy makers, hospital managers, and social health investors’ financial experts—on the feasibility of adopting SIBs to finance quality improvements in Kenya’s tertiary hospitals. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and were analyzed thematically.
resultsStakeholders perceived SIBs as conceptually attractive for promoting outcome-based financing and improving health care quality. The model has the potential to mobilize additional funding for Kenya’s tertiary health sector. However, legal, institutional, political, and financial barriers, as well as concerns about sustainability, applicability to continuous tertiary services, and the risk of prioritizing easily measurable outcomes, pose significant challenges.
conclusionFrom a public finance perspective, the successful implementation of SIBs requires enabling legislation, political leadership, credible government financial commitments, and capacity-building to attract private investors. This is necessary to manage contingent liabilities, ensure budget credibility, and reduce investor risk premiums associated with outcome-based contracts. Pilot programs, strategic alignment with tertiary national health priorities, and robust institutional frameworks are essential. Further research is recommended to evaluate the feasibility, design, and impact in primary healthcare, including specific policy and legislative reforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.