ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2026
Low forearm bone density as a clue to suspect primary hyperparathyroidism in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a retrospective study.
Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brief rationale: To evaluate the utility of forearm-DXA in differentiating postmenopausal osteoporosis and to explore its relationship with clinical features of PHPT. MAIN
resultForearm-DXA was useful for differential diagnosis and independently associated with calcium in PHPT. Significance of the paper: This is the first study demonstrating these findings. PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of forearm dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement in differentiating primary postmenopausal osteoporosis from primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) related osteoporosis and to examine its association with clinical features of PHPT.
methodsThis retrospective study included 246 women with PHPT (153 postmenopausal and 93 premenopausal) and 100 postmenopausal controls with osteopenia/osteoporosis. DXA measurements of the lumbar spine, hip, and one-third distal radius, together with clinical and biochemical data, were compared between postmenopausal patients with PHPT and controls, as well as between postmenopausal and premenopausal PHPT groups. Associations between DXA measurements and clinical findings were also analyzed in PHPT.
resultsPostmenopausal PHPT and controls were matched for age and body-mass index (BMI), osteoporosis was more frequent in PHPT (p = 0.001), with the distal radius most affected (p < 0.001). Multivariate regression confirmed an independent association between distal radius T-scores and PHPT [OR 1.88, 95% CI: 1.44-2.47]. In postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis by lumbar spine or hip DXA, ROC analysis showed that distal radius scores had excellent discriminatory value (AUC > 0.80) for differentiating PHPT from primary postmenopausal osteoporosis; optimal cutoffs were T-score < -2.4 (80.0% sensitivity, 63.6% specificity) and Z-score < -1.0 (81.5% sensitivity, 63.6% specificity). In premenopausal PHPT, calcium was independently associated with the distal radius T-score [(B = -0.594 (95% CI: -1.027 to -0.160)].
conclusionThis is the first study to show the utility of forearm DXA in differentiating primary postmenopausal osteoporosis from PHPT-related osteoporosis as well as its independent association with calcium in PHPT. Although the diagnosis of PHPT is primarily biochemical, a predominant reduction in distal radius BMD should prompt evaluation for a parathyroid disorder. Moreover, our data may provide clues to help distinguish whether osteoporosis-identified as a surgical indication in PHPT-observed in postmenopausal individuals with PHPT is primarily attributable to PHPT or to menopause.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.