Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41656421›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026

CAIX-targeted radiotracer for diagnosis and monitoring VEGFR-TKI response in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Haoyao Guo, Xiaoping Xu, Chang Liu, Linjie Bian, Shuai Liu, Jianping Zhang, Jiamin Zhu, Hualei Gan, Wei Liu, Liyan Bai and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Haoyao Guo *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xiaoping Xu *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Chang Liu *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Linjie BianDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Shuai LiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Jianping ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Jiamin ZhuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Hualei GanDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Wei LiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Liyan BaiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xin LuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xiaoyu PanCollege of Chemistry and Materials Science, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xuwei LiuCollege of Chemistry and Materials Science, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Fengsheng ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xinyu LiuCollege of Chemistry and Materials Science, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Jialiang LeiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yichong FangCollege of Chemistry and Materials Science, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Bin ZhuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xiaoqiang ShiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Zehua XingDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Meng XiaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Simin HeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xiangwei WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China. Xiangweiwang2023@outlook.com.
Shaoli SongDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China. shaoli-song@163.com.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation Program of Shanghai 24ZR1413200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCarbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) represents a promising target for molecular imaging of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). We designed three radiotracers targeting CAIX to improve the diagnostic value of imaging by increasing tumor uptake and the liver excretion pathway. We also aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of applying small-molecule radiotracers in VEGFR-TKI efficacy monitoring in renal cancer.

methodsThis study developed three novel CAIX-targeting radiotracers, which were evaluated in vitro and in vivo; The study also included 8 patients with ccRCC, all of whom had paired [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-FZCI-3 PET/CT and [18F]-FDG PET/CT. The diagnostic efficacies of these two PET tracers were compared. Moreover, VEGFR-TKI efficacy monitoring experiments using [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-FZCI-3 was conducted on OS-RC-2 models.

resultsThree radiotracers showed that different liver/renal accumulations were better correlated with factors including distinct plasma protein binding abilities. [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-FZCI-3, primarily cleared through the hepatobiliary system in patients, demonstrated a higher SUVmax of renal lesions (median, 13.10 vs. 3.10, n = 4; *P = 0.04) and superior tumor-to-muscle ratio of metastatic lesions (9.25 ± 5.10 vs.3.64 ± 2.11, n = 16; **P = 0.004) to [18F]-FDG in a prospective cohort with 8 ccRCC patients. In VEGFR-TKI efficacy monitoring experiments, [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-FZCI-3 showed markedly decreased tumor radiotracer uptake throughout treatment. Moreover, VEGFR-AKT-mTOR pathway inhibition and CAIX downregulation in the treatment group confirmed that [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-FZCI-3 PET/CT is a viable strategy for monitoring TKI efficacy in renal cell cancer.

conclusion[68Ga]Ga-NOTA-FZCI-3 is a promising radiotracer for improving diagnosis, staging, and VEGFR-TKI efficacy monitoring in ccRCC.

Indexed as

Carbonic Anhydrase IXCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorAgedAnimalsCell Line, TumorFemaleGallium RadioisotopesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadioactive TracersRadiopharmaceuticalsCarbonic Anhydrase IXGallium RadioisotopesProtein Kinase InhibitorsRadioactive TracersRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor[68Ga]GaCarbonic anhydrase IXClear cell renal cell carcinomaPET/CT imaging

Identifiers

PMID41656421
PMCPMC13197305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.