ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Integrating standard and native spaces for radiomics and brain network analysis in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and prognosis.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionStructural MRI analysis for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is limited by balancing group-level comparability in standard space with anatomical fidelity in native space. We therefore propose a multi-space, hybrid-feature framework, integrating radiomics and network metrics from both spaces to classify AD and predict mild cognitive impairment (MCI) progression.
methodsAn integrated dual-space analytical framework was applied to T1-weighted MRI data. Models were developed on 1,477 participants from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and externally tested on an independent cohort of 1,349 participants from National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC). The framework extracts parallel radiomic and graph-based network features from both Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) standard space and native space. These features were used to build machine learning models for three-class diagnosis (NC vs. MCI vs. AD) and 6-year prognostic prediction of MCI-to-AD conversion. For each task, the models using standard-space, native-space, and combined-space features were systematically compared. Model interpretation was performed using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), and the features were validated against established AD biomarkers.
resultsThe combined-space model demonstrated superior performance in both diagnostic classification (Macro-Averaged AUC: 0.96 in ADNI cohort, 0.94 in NACC cohort) and prognostic prediction of MCI-to-AD conversion (C-index: 0.83; HRs: 7.60, 95%CIs: 4.57-12.64). The extracted features in the ADNI cohort demonstrated significant correlations with APOE ε4 genotype, cognitive scores, and CSF biomarkers.
conclusionIntegrating multi-scale features from both standard and native spaces enhances AD diagnosis and prognosis accuracy more effectively than conventional single-space analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41656413What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.