ArticlePharmacological reports : PR2026
The Sigma
Article in Pharmacological reports : PR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMu opioid receptor (MOR) agonists are the primary medication class used to treat moderate to severe pain; however, the ongoing opioid overdose crisis underscores the need for alternatives to MOR agonists for pain treatment. Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), a cannabinoid CB1 receptor (CB1R) agonist, and sigma1 receptor (σ1R) antagonists elicit antinociceptive effects albeit less effectively than MOR agonists. Co-administration of σ1R antagonists with THC may offer a safer alternative for pain management.
methodsAntinociception (warm water tail withdrawal in mice and hot plate assays in rats), hypothermia (mice and rats), locomotion (mice), and drug discrimination (rats) assays were employed to evaluate the effects of the σ1R antagonist CM304 alone and in combination with THC.
resultsIn naïve mice, CM304 (ip) shifted the antinociceptive time-effect function of 32 mg/kg (ip) THC upward. Similarly, greater hypothermia was observed with combinations of THC and CM304 than each compound alone. Only the high dose of CM304 (56 mg/kg) induced hypolocomotion. In naïve rats, CM304 (1.0 and 3.2 mg/kg, iv) dose-dependently shifted the antinociceptive dose-effect function of THC to the left. In rats trained to discriminate THC (3.2 mg/kg, ip), CM304 (10 and 17.8 mg/kg) did not elicit THC-like discriminative stimulus effects. In contrast to the antinociceptive experiments, CM304 (10 mg/kg) did not significantly shift the discrimination dose-effect function of THC. These results suggest that σ1R antagonists like CM304 can potentiate the antinociceptive effects of THC without potentiating its adverse effects, supporting their potential as adjuncts to CB1R agonists for acute pain treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41656401What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.