ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
The specificity of HEG1 as mesothelioma marker depends on the differential diagnosis.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cellular Plasticity in Malignant Transformation: Mesothelial Cells.Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to analyze the diagnostic role of HEG homolog 1 (HEG1) in cancers affecting the serosal cavities. HEG1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry was analyzed in 534 specimens (341 effusions and 193 surgical specimens). Effusions consisted of 151 tubo-ovarian carcinomas, 59 breast carcinomas, 44 mesotheliomas, 37 lung carcinomas, 29 uterine corpus and cervical carcinomas, 17 gastrointestinal carcinomas and 4 genitourinary carcinomas. Surgical specimens consisted of 139 tubo-ovarian carcinomas, 42 mesotheliomas, 7 multicystic mesothelial proliferations and 5 papillary mesothelial tumors. HEG1 expression was found in 43/44 (98%) mesothelioma effusions and 39/42 (93%) surgical mesothelioma specimens, as well as all multicystic and papillary mesothelial tumors. HEG1 was infrequently expressed in breast carcinoma (4/59; 7%), lung carcinoma (2/37; 5%) and cervical/uterine carcinoma effusions (3/29; 10%), but was often detected in tubo-ovarian carcinoma effusions (80/151; 53%) and surgical specimens (99/139, 71%). HEG1 was additionally consistently expressed by reactive mesothelial cells in effusions and in endothelial cells in surgical specimens. HEG1 had sensitivity of 95% for diagnosing malignant mesothelioma in all studied specimens, with a specificity of 38% in the differential diagnosis from tubo-ovarian carcinoma and 93% in the differential diagnosis from non-tubo-ovarian carcinomas. Of 179 HEG1-positive carcinomas, 172 expressed the epithelial marker claudin-4. In conclusion, HEG1 is a highly sensitive marker of both benign and malignant mesothelial cells. It shows high specificity in the differentiation of mesothelioma from lung or breast carcinoma but is of little value in differentiating mesothelioma from tubo-ovarian carcinoma. The potential role of HEG1 as vascular marker merits further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.