SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
Beta-blockers improve neurological outcomes of cerebral cavernous malformations: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are vascular lesions in the brain, presenting risks of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and non-hemorrhagic focal neurological deficit (NH-FND). Currently, no effective medical therapy exists for CCMs, and treatment options limited to surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery. Beta-blockers, particularly propranolol, have shown promise in treating similar vascular conditions and may have therapeutic potential for CCMs. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov (March 2024) for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing neurological outcomes in adult patients with CCMs treated with beta-blockers versus controls. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4. The primary outcomes were the incidence of new-onset ICH and NH-FND attributable to CCMs. Five studies (1 RCT and 4 cohort studies; n = 1,553 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Beta-blocker exposure was associated with significantly lower odds of new-onset ICH or NH-FND attributable to CCMs (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.35-0.77; p = 0.001), with low heterogeneity (I² = 35%). Subgroup analysis showed a reduced incidence of new ICH alone (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.39-0.91; p = 0.02). In propranolol-specific analyses, the reduction in the primary outcome was not statistically significant (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.08-1.38; p = 0.13). Beta-blocker therapy was associated with improved neurological outcomes in patients with CCMs, with a significant reduction in the risk of new-onset ICH and NH-FND. However, propranolol alone did not demonstrate a statistically significant benefit, potentially due to subtherapeutic dosing and adverse effects. The evidence suggests other beta-blockers may also be beneficial, but further research is needed to clarify their roles and optimal regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41656371What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.