ArticleScientific reports2026
Isotherm, kinetic, and thermodynamic insights into textile effluent remediation using acid-treated sugarcane peel.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Valorization of chicken bone waste into biochar adsorbent for methyl red adsorption from aqueous systems.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Greener synthesized P-doped carbon for dual applications: selective cationic dye removal with phytotoxicity assessment and industrial effluent treatment.RSC advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wastewater from textile industries contains persistent contaminants that require low-cost, efficient, and eco-friendly treatment solutions. This work evaluates the performance of acid-treated sugarcane peel (ATSP) as a sustainable adsorbent for textile effluent treatment, compared with untreated sugarcane peel (UTSP). Sorption experiments were performed under optimized conditions (120 min contact time, pH 5–6, 20 mg adsorbent in 25 mL effluent). ATSP achieved 85% pollutant removal against 68% for UTSP. The Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetics best described the adsorption process, confirming monolayer chemisorption with a maximum capacity of 50.04 mg/g. Thermodynamic analysis confirmed an endothermic and spontaneous process, while scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analyses revealed enhanced porosity and active functional groups on adsorbent. After five reuse cycles, the adsorbent retained 60% efficiency. Unlike previous studies focused on single-solute dye systems, this work provides comprehensive mechanistic and techno-economic evaluation of phosphoric-acid-treated sugarcane peel for real textile effluent remediation. Thus acid-treated sugarcane peel gave strong potential as an effective, sustainable, and reusable material for the treatment of textile wastewater.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.