ArticleScientific reports2026
Physics-guided machine learning framework for RCA concrete by experimental database, modelling, and statistical validation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The search for sustainable construction materials has increased the use of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA); however, variability in mechanical performance and the absence of accurate forecasting tools limit its utilization. A complete laboratory program utilized RCA from six parent strength classes (C5–C50) and three particle-size fractions (0–4 mm, 5–11 mm, 12–22 mm) at 10%–50% replacement levels. The mechanical performance of concrete incorporating RCA is strongly influenced by the aforementioned parameters. This study proposes a physics-guided machine learning (ML) framework to predict the compressive strength (CS) and splitting tensile strength (STS) of RCA concrete, explicitly addressing data sparsity and RCA-induced variability. A comprehensive experimental database covering multiple RCA replacement levels, particle-size fractions, and parent concrete strength classes was established, and gradient-boosting models (XGBoost and LightGBM) were trained using a physics-guided data augmentation strategy in which synthetic samples were generated within physically admissible bounds derived from experimental variability. The model’s performance was assessed using R², RMSE, and MAE, with supplementary error stratification across RCA regimes. The results show that the proposed framework achieves strong predictive accuracy and stable performance, with RMSE values remaining within ranges considered acceptable experimentally, even at higher RCA replacement levels. The accompanying statistical analyses confirm that the observed reductions in strength associated with increasing RCA content are both statistically significant and physically meaningful. Compared with conventional augmentation approaches, the physics-guided strategy improves model robustness in sparsely populated regions of the dataset without introducing non-physical relationships. As a result, the framework provides a transparent, physically consistent machine-learning approach for data-driven mixture design and the development of sustainable concrete systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.