ArticleScientific reports2026
GEMS satellite data fusion for hourly air quality prediction in Taiwan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately assessing the health risks of air pollution remains challenging owing to the limited spatial coverage of ground-based monitoring stations. Geostationary satellites, such as the Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS), provide unprecedented opportunities for real-time large-scale air quality surveillance. This study integrated multi-source data, including GEMS satellite observations, ground monitoring data, meteorological variables, and geographic information to predict daytime hourly concentrations of six key air pollutants (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 μm [PM₂.₅], particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤ 10 μm [PM₁₀], O₃, NO₂, CO, and SO₂) across Taiwan. A multi-output categorical gradient boosting (CatBoost) model was developed to simultaneously estimate the concentrations of all six pollutants within a single framework. To enhance the robustness and operational relevance of the model, a rolling prediction approach was employed for training and validation. The model demonstrated strong predictive performance, with R² values of 0.86 (O₃), 0.84 (PM₁₀), 0.81 (PM₂.₅ and NO₂), 0.79 (CO), and 0.52 (SO₂), and mean absolute error (MAE) values ranging from 0.06 to 9.40. O₃ predictions were particularly stable, exhibiting relatively low root mean squared error (RMSE) and MAE values. A spatial comparison of predicted and observed concentrations from July‒December 2023 revealed strong concordance, although some localized discrepancies were observed. Overall, the model effectively captured complex spatiotemporal pollutant dynamics. These findings demonstrated that integrating GEMS observations with multisource data in a machine-learning framework enabled accurate, real-time, hourly predictions of multiple air pollutants and offers a scalable solution to support public health policy and exposure risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.