ArticleScientific reports2026
Predominantly positive XCO
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Caatinga biome, the only exclusively Brazilian biome, plays a crucial yet understudied role in regional and global carbon dynamics. Using column-averaged dry-air mole fraction of CO2 (XCO2) data from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) between 2015 and 2022, this study investigates spatial and temporal anomalies across distinct phytoecological biozones of the Caatinga. Anomaly detection, spatial autocorrelation (Local Moran’s I), time-series modeling (ARIMA), and correlation analyses with vegetation and climate indices (NDVI, EVI, LAI, land surface temperature, and precipitation) were applied to evaluate the biome’s carbon balance. Results reveal heterogeneous XCO2 patterns, with predominantly negative or neutral anomalies, confirming the Caatinga’s role as a carbon sink, though punctuated by localized positive anomalies indicating emission hotspots. The Savanna-Steppe and Pioneer Formation biozones exhibited the strongest seasonal and spatial clustering of positive anomalies, highlighting vulnerability to land-use pressures and climatic extremes. Forested biozones, particularly Open and Dense Ombrophilous Forests, showed increasing anomaly trends in recent years, suggesting a potential weakening of sink capacity. Correlations revealed distinct biome-specific responses: positive associations between XCO2 and precipitation in transitional and pioneer formations, and negative associations with vegetation indices in savanna areas, emphasizing hydrological control of carbon fluxes. The findings demonstrate that the Caatinga exhibits both resilience and vulnerability, with its carbon balance strongly modulated by climatic variability, vegetation structure, and anthropogenic pressures. These results underscore the biome’s strategic role in climate mitigation and the urgent need for targeted conservation and restoration policies to safeguard its carbon sequestration potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.