ArticleBehavioral and brain functions : BBF2026
Investigating interbrain synchrony under teamwork disruption: an fNIRS hyperscanning study.
Article in Behavioral and brain functions : BBF, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTeams are inherently adaptive entities that continuously adapt to changes or disruptions in their tasks or environments. During collaboration, interbrain synchrony (IBS) emerges, reflecting the temporal alignment of neural activity between team members. Building on this, IBS has been proposed as a potential marker of teamwork, suggesting that IBS should be sensitive to changes in teamwork. PURPOSE: The present study investigated whether IBS is sensitive to changes in teamwork. We hypothesized that disruptions in teamwork would be accompanied by alterations in IBS dynamics.
methodsNinety-eight healthy adults (mean age = 22.5 ± 3.22 years; 69 females, 65.1%) were assigned to forty-nine dyads. Each pair completed a 20-minute computer-based navigation task while their brain activity was simultaneously recorded using fNIRS hyperscanning. Dyads in the experimental group encountered an unexpected increase in task difficulty midway through the task, whereas those in the control group completed the task without disruption. We examined three features of IBS - its overall level, temporal slope trajectory, and the temporal recurrence patterns.
resultsControl analyses confirmed that IBS reliably emerged during the task (χ²(1) = 50.24, p < .001) and that the experimental manipulation successfully disrupted teamwork, as reflected in altered team behavioral responses in communication (χ²(1) = 8.48, p = 0.004) and performance (χ²(1) = 24.99, p < .001). Nevertheless, no evidence was found for disruption-related changes in IBS across the three features examined (all Time x Group interactions p > .05.
conclusionThese findings raise the possibility that IBS may reflect a stable collective state rather than a reactive one, thereby challenging its interpretation as a direct marker of teamwork. Methodological considerations, including the operationalization of IBS, are also discussed as potential explanations for the lack of observed change in IBS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.