ArticleBMC medical education2026
Feasibility and efficacy of a neurovascular ultrasound training course for undergraduate medical students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeurovascular ultrasound is an easily applicable bed-side tool for guiding the diagnosis and monitoring of cerebrovascular disease. Although sonography training is increasingly integrated in medical school curricula, neurovascular ultrasound has been largely neglected in these efforts. We therefore aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a neurovascular ultrasound training course for medical students.
methodsFive small-group neurovascular ultrasound course offerings were conducted between 2016 and 2019 at the Medical University of Graz, Austria. This study represents a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected educational course evaluation data. Each course offering followed the same course structure and assessment schedule and was offered to 2nd - to 5th -year medical students. Demographics and previous ultrasound experience were documented. To test pre-course knowledge, all participants completed a theoretical test, followed by the 20-hour hands-on training course comprising a standardized step-by-step examination of the extra- and intracranial brain-supplying arteries. Afterwards, all students underwent a practical exam in single-station Objective Structured Clinical Examination format, conducted by neurovascular ultrasound experts, blinded to the study's scope and data, using a predefined standard protocol.
resultsA total of 51 students (median age: 23 years, IQR: 1; range: 21-28; 24 females, 47%) participated in the courses. Of those, 27 (53%) had previous ultrasound experience. For the practical exam, participants achieved a median score of 56/66 points (IQR: 9; 85%). 44 students (86%) achieved a score above a 70% passing threshold. Of note, results were independent of previous practical ultrasound experience and theoretical pre-course knowledge (p each > 0.1).
conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility and efficacy of a simply designed neurovascular ultrasound course in medical students. It can provide substantial hands-on competence even in students without previous ultrasound experience, supporting its integration into medical school curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.