ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Phenotypic, phytochemical and mineral characterization of wild Prunus cerasifera genotypes from Eastern Anatolia.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined the associations between genotypic variation, environmental conditions, and the phytochemical composition, mineral content, and antioxidant capacity of wild Prunus cerasifera genotypes in diverse ecogeographic regions of Eastern Anatolia (Türkiye). Thirteen genotypes were evaluated for morphological, physicochemical, and biochemical traits under varying climatic conditions, including temperature, humidity, precipitation, and solar radiation. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) revealed the multidimensional nature of this variation, indicating that environmental variables, particularly temperature and solar radiation, were associated with differences in mineral accumulation and phenolic compound levels. Warmer and sunnier environments were linked to higher nutritional density, while genotypes from more humid conditions exhibited a "dilution effect," reflecting a balance between fruit size and bioactive compound concentration. Substantial variation was observed among genotypes, with up to a five-fold difference in total phenolic content and marked differences in mineral composition, highlighting the broad genetic diversity in wild populations. Certain genotypes showed notable nutritional characteristics: 44PC01 had the highest flavonoid content and antioxidant capacity, 23PC05 accumulated higher levels of macroelements (Mg, K, Ca), and 44PC03 and 44PC07 contained the highest microelements (Fe, Zn, Cr). Partial correlation analysis, after accounting for genotypic differences, suggested that genetic background was the main source of variation in fruit quality traits, while associations with environmental variables were comparatively weaker. Overall, these findings provide evidence of phenotypic and biochemical diversity among wild P. cerasifera genotypes and emphasize their value as genetic resources for conservation and future multi-year breeding studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.