ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Prognosis prediction of patients with disorders of consciousness based on digital twin brain models.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital twin for neurological conditions: a systematic scoping review.Biomedical engineering letters · 2026Review
- Multimodal Assessment of Consciousness with Brain-Computer Interfaces and Artificial Intelligence: From Acquired Brain Injury to Neurodegenerative Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe accurate prediction of prognosis in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) is a significant challenge in clinical practice. Some studies based on traditional electroencephalography (EEG) features have shown potential for DOC prognosis. However, the underlying mechanisms behind the recovery of patients with DOC still lack in-depth research.
methodsIn this study, we used mathematical tools to construct digital twin brain models (DTBM) for DOC patients with different outcomes. Then, we trained a support vector machine classifier using model parameters and modal controllability features to distinguish between DOC patients with different outcomes, and assessed the importance of these features. Finally, we used a support vector machine regressor to predict the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) score at 6-month follow-up.
resultsThe results showed that the prognosis model based on local model parameters and modal controllability features achieved better performance (AUC = 90.22%, F-score = 86.00%, SEN = 84.31%, SPE = 91.43%) than the prognosis models based on some traditional EEG features. Additionally, a positive prognosis is associated with lower levels of inhibitory gain, higher levels of excitatory gain and modal controllability, particularly in brain regions within the frontoparietal network. In 74% and 70% of UWS and MCS patients, the MAE between the predicted CRS-R score and the actual CRS-R score was less than 5.
conclusionsOverall, our study contributes to enriching the neuromarkers associated with DOC prognosis and further elucidates the neural mechanisms of consciousness recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.