Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41656173›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2026

Odor-Cued Targeted Reactivation Was Unable to Selectively Benefit Declarative Memories During Sleep.

Gautam Narayan, George Babineaux, Matthew Cho, Sandhya Murugavel, Tiange Lu, Nicholas J Lew, Sarvia Aquino Argueta, Eitan Schechtman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gautam NarayanDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
George BabineauxDepartment of Biology, School of Science and Technology, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.
Matthew ChoDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Sandhya MurugavelDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Tiange LuDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Nicholas J LewDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Sarvia Aquino ArguetaDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Eitan SchechtmanDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8127-012X

Funding

The role of context in sleep-related memory reactivation in humansR00MH122663 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI SCHECHTMAN-DRAYMAN, EITAN · 2023 to 2025
$933k
The role of context in sleep-related memory reactivation in humansK99MH122663 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI SCHECHTMAN-DRAYMAN, EITAN · 2021 to 2022
$186k
NIH HHS R00-MH122663NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH122663NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH122663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Declarative memories are reactivated-and thereby consolidated-during sleep. Real-life memories are typically nested hierarchically (e.g., memory for making coffee nested within memory for one's morning routine). We tested the specificity of memory reactivation during sleep in humans: is it limited to low-tier items or does it extend to wider contexts? To test this, we adapted a well-replicated design using targeted memory reactivation, which uses non-invasive sensory cues to preferentially reactivate memories during sleep. Thirty-two participants (18 women and 14 men) learned two sets of object locations, each paired with a unique odour. By cueing one odour during non-REM sleep, we tested whether reactivation would benefit the entire learning context or selectively enhance the cued set. Our results show no overall benefit for the cued set over the non-cued one. A more nuanced, encoding-strength-dependent reactivation effect was observed for the cued category relative to the non-cued one. Whereas previous studies showed that odour presentation increased spectral activity in the sigma range, putatively reflecting sleep spindles, we found a sustained (~15 s) inhibition following presentation. The results indicate that cueing did not uniformly benefit the targeted memories. One explanation for these results is that cueing benefits may have generalised across the learning context as a whole rather than impacting a single set of memories. Moreover, our results provide more evidence that initial encoding strength dictates the extent of reactivation effectiveness.

Indexed as

CuesMemoryOdorantsSleepAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41656173
PMCPMC13059829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.