ArticleBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology2026
Pharmacokinetics of Perampanel in Danish Paediatric Patients With Epilepsy Based on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.
Article in Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical validation of a patient-friendly saliva microsampling approach to monitor perampanel levels in people with epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Pharmacokinetics of Perampanel in Danish Paediatric Patients With Epilepsy Based on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We aimed to quantify inter- and intra-patient variability in serum perampanel concentrations and assess whether concentrations predict efficacy or tolerability. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 68 children and adolescents (< 18 years) treated at the Danish Epilepsy Centre (2017-2024), analysing 311 TDM samples. Dose-normalized concentration ratio was summarized as the concentration-to-dose-per-kilogram ratio (C:(D/kg)) and evaluated by age group and co-medication category: enzyme-inducing anti-seizure medications (ASMs), valproate or non-inducing ASMs. Clinical outcomes were change in seizure burden, seizure freedom and adverse effects. Perampanel concentrations were outside the recommended therapeutic range in 13.8% of samples, and C:(D/kg) varied 59.2-fold across patients. Children < 6 years had lower concentration than adolescents > 12 years, and enzyme-inducing ASMs markedly reduced C:(D/kg). Overall, 80.9% of patients had reduced seizure burden, and 20.6% became seizure-free, but serum concentrations did not correlate with seizure freedom or adverse effects. TDM is valuable for detecting under- or over-dosing caused by age-related clearance changes or enzyme-inducing co-medications. While dose adjustments can be guided by serum concentrations, optimization should ultimately target clinical seizure reduction and tolerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.