ArticleTuberculosis and respiratory diseases2026
Biologics in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Current Status and Future Prospects.
Article in Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging targeted therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: from symptom control to precision medicine.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significant progress has been made in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), yet substantial unmet needs persist due to the disease's heterogeneity and the diverse underlying inflammatory mechanisms. Recent advances have broadened our understanding of COPD beyond a single pathophysiologic model, leading to the development of biologic therapies that target specific immune pathways. This review summarizes current evidence from clinical trials involving biologics in COPD. Early efforts to inhibit non-type 2 inflammation yielded limited results, highlighting the necessity for more refined, endotype-based approaches. Subsequent phase 3 trials have shown considerable clinical benefits in specific patient subsets: dupilumab, which blocks interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 signaling, and mepolizumab, which targets IL-5, consistently reduced exacerbation frequency among patients with high blood eosinophil counts (≥300 cells/μL). In contrast, other biologics-such as benralizumab, tezepelumab, and IL-33/suppression of tumorigenicity 2 pathway inhibitors like itepekimab, tozorakimab, and astegolimab-have demonstrated variable efficacy, often influenced by biomarker profiles and patient characteristics. These findings emphasize the importance of precise patient stratification based on inflammatory endotypes. While biologics mark a significant advancement for select COPD populations, further research is needed to clarify long-term outcomes, refine biomarker thresholds, and broaden treatment options for non-eosinophilic COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.