SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Digestible and Metabolizable Energy Intake in Humans: a Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding digestible energy intake (DEI) and metabolizable energy intake (MEI) is essential for elucidating human energy balance. The absolute of DEI refers to gross energy intake minus fecal energy loss (EL), whereas MEI further accounts for urinary EL. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the findings from studies that utilized bomb calorimetry to measure DEI and/or MEI (PROSPERO CRD42021230982). Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (via PubMed), the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Scopus were searched for articles published between January 1973 and July 2024. Human studies (adults aged ≥18 y) were included without restrictions on study design. Data were descriptively summarized according to dietary conditions, including overeating, undereating, high-fiber diets, tree nut intake, time-restricted eating (TRE), medication use, and disease status. Twenty-three studies were included. Overeating generally increased absolute fecal ELs; however, proportional DEI and MEI remained relatively stable, suggesting adaptive responses. High-fiber diets and tree nut intake consistently lowered the proportions of DEI and MEI, indicating that dietary composition affects energy absorption efficiency. Results for TRE were inconsistent, with 1 study showing increased fecal EL and another reporting no significant changes. Aging and disease, particularly short bowel syndrome and home parenteral nutrition dependence, were associated with markedly reduced proportions of DEI and MEI. Despite methodological variability across studies, this review highlighted that both dietary quantity and composition significantly influence energy absorption. Furthermore, limited evidence suggested that aging and diseases impair energy absorption. Future studies using standardized protocols and randomized controlled trials are warranted to clarify the determinants of DEI and MEI across diverse populations. This study was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42021230982.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.