Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41655373›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Comparative efficacy of oral and cloacal administration of Lactobacillus probiotics and postbiotics against Campylobacter jejuni colonization in broiler chickens.

Shreeya Sharma, Hosni Hassan, Khaled Abdelaziz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shreeya SharmaDepartment of Animal and Veterinary Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Hosni HassanPrestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, NC 27695, USA.
Khaled AbdelazizDepartment of Animal and Veterinary Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA; Clemson University School of Health Research (CUSHR), Clemson, SC 29634, USA. Electronic address: Khaled2@clemson.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Campylobacter jejuni remains a major cause of foodborne illness worldwide, with poultry serving as the primary reservoir. In the absence of commercial vaccines or effective feed additives, probiotics and their byproducts (postbiotics) represent a promising and sustainable approach to reducing Campylobacter colonization in poultry. This study compared the efficacy of oral and cloacal administration of probiotic lactobacilli and their postbiotics in reducing Campylobacter colonization and modulating the cecal microbiome in broiler chickens. Day-old chicks were assigned to seven treatment groups that received either probiotics (live cells of four poultry-derived Lactobacillus strains: L. reuteri P43, L. acidophilus P42, L. animalis P38, and L. crispatus C25) or postbiotics (Lactobacillus supernatants) or their combination (whole cultures) orally or intracloacally, with a non-treated group serving as a control. Chickens were challenged with C. jejuni strain 81-176 at the second week of age, and cecal contents were collected at the fifth week for Campylobacter enumeration and microbiome profiling. The results revealed that both oral and cloacal administration of Lactobacillus cells significantly reduced Campylobacter cecal loads by 0.34 and 0.78 log₁₀, respectively, compared to the control. Significant differences in microbial richness and evenness were observed among treatment groups, with groups administered orally with probiotics, postbiotics, or their combination consistently showing higher alpha diversity indices than controls. NMDS ordination confirmed distinct community clustering among the treatment groups. Differential abundance analysis (MaAsLin2) further revealed that Ruminococcus was significantly enriched in the group receiving intracloacal postbiotic treatment, whereas the genus unclassified Firmicutes was more abundant in the group that received the combined probiotic-postbiotic treatment orally. Opportunistic genera, such as Escherichia-Shigella and Faecalicoccus, were significantly higher in the control group compared to all treated groups. Overall, while probiotics and postbiotics, whether given alone or together, modulated the gut microbial composition in Campylobacter-infected broilers, the administration of probiotic cells offered additional benefits by reducing Campylobacter colonization.

Indexed as

Campylobacter InfectionsCampylobacter jejuniChickensGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLactobacillusPoultry DiseasesProbioticsAdministration, OralAnimalsCecumCloacaMaleRandom AllocationCampylobacterChickenLactobacillusPostbioticsProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID41655373
PMCPMC12907218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.