Observational studyThe Journal of international medical research2026
Safety profile of progesterone: Insights from an FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)-based pharmacovigilance study.
Observational study in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Raloxifene and progesterone neuroprotection in a female mouse model of Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the safety profile of progesterone by analyzing adverse event data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) between 2004 and 2024.Materials and methodsThis retrospective, observational pharmacovigilance study was based on data from the FAERS database. A total of 1827 adverse event reports associated with progesterone were retrieved. Disproportionality analysis methods, including the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker, were used to evaluate the frequency, signal strength, and time-to-onset of adverse events.ResultsAmong 24,589,239 adverse event reports in the reporting system, 1827 were associated with progesterone, covering 22 system organ classes and 152 preferred terms. The most frequently reported preferred terms were maternal exposure during pregnancy (151 cases), spontaneous abortion (144 cases), and abnormal product odor (114 cases). The top three preferred terms showing the strongest signals were decidual cast (reporting odds ratio: 2825.23), chondrodermatitis nodularis chronica helicis (reporting odds ratio: 3897.61), and autoimmune dermatitis (reporting odds ratio: 1519.29). Most adverse events occurred within 30 to 180 days after exposure. Newly identified preferred terms associated with progesterone included acute eosinophilic pneumonia, meningioma, and autoimmune dermatitis.ConclusionsThis study identified notable safety concerns associated with progesterone use and detected several rare adverse events. These findings underscore the need for continued monitoring, updated prescribing guidelines, and further investigation into progesterone formulations and adverse event mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.