Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41655271›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of international medical research2026

Safety profile of progesterone: Insights from an FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)-based pharmacovigilance study.

Ren Xu, Xiaona Wang, Junqin Zhang, Yanan Ren, Luyang Su, Lu Sang, Jianzhi Su

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ren XuQuality Management Department, Hebei General Hospital, China.
Xiaona WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, China.
Junqin ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, China.
Yanan RenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, China.
Luyang SuPhysical Examination Center, Hebei General Hospital, China.
Lu SangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, China.
Jianzhi SuDepartment of Urology Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, China.ORCID 0009-0006-0414-6391

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the safety profile of progesterone by analyzing adverse event data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) between 2004 and 2024.Materials and methodsThis retrospective, observational pharmacovigilance study was based on data from the FAERS database. A total of 1827 adverse event reports associated with progesterone were retrieved. Disproportionality analysis methods, including the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker, were used to evaluate the frequency, signal strength, and time-to-onset of adverse events.ResultsAmong 24,589,239 adverse event reports in the reporting system, 1827 were associated with progesterone, covering 22 system organ classes and 152 preferred terms. The most frequently reported preferred terms were maternal exposure during pregnancy (151 cases), spontaneous abortion (144 cases), and abnormal product odor (114 cases). The top three preferred terms showing the strongest signals were decidual cast (reporting odds ratio: 2825.23), chondrodermatitis nodularis chronica helicis (reporting odds ratio: 3897.61), and autoimmune dermatitis (reporting odds ratio: 1519.29). Most adverse events occurred within 30 to 180 days after exposure. Newly identified preferred terms associated with progesterone included acute eosinophilic pneumonia, meningioma, and autoimmune dermatitis.ConclusionsThis study identified notable safety concerns associated with progesterone use and detected several rare adverse events. These findings underscore the need for continued monitoring, updated prescribing guidelines, and further investigation into progesterone formulations and adverse event mechanisms.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacovigilanceProgesteroneAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationProgesteroneadverse drug reaction reporting systemsadverse eventspharmacovigilanceProgesteronesafety profile

Identifiers

PMID41655271
PMCPMC12883713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.