ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026
A comprehensive benchmarking study on computational tools for cross-omics label transfer from single-cell RNA to ATAC data.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning enables de novo mapping of cell type-specific RNA splicing regulation from scRNA-seq data.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With continuous progress of single-cell chromatin accessibility profiling techniques, scATAC-seq has become more commonly used in investigating regulatory genomic regions and their involvement in developmental, evolutionary, and disease-related processes. At the same time, accurate cell type annotation plays a crucial role in comprehending the cellular makeup of complex tissues and uncovering novel cell types. Unfortunately, the majority of existing methods primarily focus on label transfer within scRNA-seq datasets and only a limited number of approaches have been specifically developed for transferring labels from scRNA-seq to scATAC-seq data. Moreover, many methods have been published for the joint embedding of data from the two modalities, which can be used for label transfer by adding a classifier trained on the latent space. Given these available methods, this study presents a comprehensive benchmarking study evaluating 27 computational tools for scATAC-seq label annotations through tasks involving single-cell RNA and ATAC data from various human and mouse tissues. We found that when high-quality paired data were available to transfer labels across unpaired data, Bridge and GLUE were the best performers; otherwise, bindSC and GLUE achieved the highest prediction accuracy overall. All these methods were able to use peak-level information instead of purely relying on the gene activities from scATAC-seq. Furthermore, we found that data imbalance, cross-omics dissimilarity on common cell types, data binarization, and the introduction of semi-supervised strategy usually had negative impacts on model performance. In terms of scalability, we found that the most time and memory efficient methods were Bridge and deep learning-based algorithms like GLUE. Based on the results of this study, we provide several suggestions for future methodology development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.