ArticleAnatomical science international2026
The arterial tree in the pig hindlimb from a more comprehensive perspective: anatomical study with translational implications.
Article in Anatomical science international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAlthough various vessel-related models using pig hindlimbs have been reported, descriptions of the arterial tree of pig hindlimbs are either rare or confusing. This cadaveric study was designed to explore and describe the anatomy of the arterial tree of pig hindlimbs and to compare with the arterial tree in human legs. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe vascular anatomy of the hindlimb of lard infused pigs (Shanghai White Pig) was investigated (n = 20). The primary parameters were as follows: the course and branches of the arterial tree of pig hindlimbs; the discrepancy in the anatomical terms of the arterial tree of pig hindlimbs between the classic veterinary books and the literature; the comparison of the arterial tree of pig hindlimbs and the arterial tree in human legs; and the addition of the arterial tree in human legs from the literature.
resultsThe internal iliac artery and external iliac artery directly originated from the abdominal aorta without forming a common trunk (the common iliac artery in humans). According to their continuation, the arterial tree of pig hindlimbs was divided into the following segments: external iliac artery, femoral artery, popliteal artery, and cranial tibial artery. The anatomical terms of the arterial tree of pig hindlimbs in the literature exhibit great discrepancies. It was also observed that the arterial tree of pig hindlimbs and the arterial tree in human legs greatly differed. Some studies have reported good additions of the arterial tree of pig hindlimbs.
conclusionsThis study describes the anatomic differences between the arterial tree of pig hindlimbs and the arterial tree in human legs enabling a more consistent nomenclature when using pig studies for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41655171What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.