ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Experimental effects of paracetamol overdose on the development of forensic insects.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In forensic entomology, postmortem interval (PMI) estimation relies on the age, development, and succession patterns of insects on decomposing remains; however, the presence of drugs in the body can disrupt insect development and compromise the accuracy of these estimates. Paracetamol, a commonly used over-the-counter drug in Southern Africa, is often implicated in both intentional and accidental overdose cases. This study investigates the effects of paracetamol on insect development using spiked pig carcasses as experimental models to simulate human overdose. Three pigs received paracetamol at ascending doses 75 mg/kg (toxic), 150 mg/kg (lethal), and 300 mg/kg (double lethal), and the fourth pig served as an untreated control. The experimental carcasses were placed in separate metal cages in a natural outdoor environment during the autumn season, and insect samples were collected daily over a 32-day period. Observations and morphological measurements of the length, width, and weight were recorded for selected dipteran and coleopteran species of forensic value. Results showed that Chrysomya putoria and Chrysomya megacephala exhibited an increased larval length, width, and weight at double lethal doses. Lucilia sericata showed significant reductions in weight at all paracetamol doses (p = 0.012, 0.001 and 0.001) in comparison to the control, while Chrysomya albiceps and Thanatophilus micans were not affected by the drug. Furthermore, results showed that the mortality rates of newly emerged Ch. putoria, Ch. megacephala, Ch. albiceps and L. sericata were higher in paracetamol-treated groups compared to those observed from the control group, with the rates of 22.2% at the toxic dose, 35.0% at the lethal dose, 45.0% at the double lethal dose, and 11.1% in the control group. Morphological abnormalities were observed in newly emerged adults of Ch. putoria and L. sericata that showed progressive wing deformities at the toxic and lethal doses and discoloration at the double lethal dose. Ch. albiceps exhibited no observable deformities across all doses. These findings show that paracetamol disrupts critical developmental processes in certain species in a dose-dependent manner, highlighting the need to study its effects on other forensically important insects. Moreover, these findings contribute towards enhancing PMI precision and advancing forensic entomotoxicology in the region by generating local baseline data for KwaZulu Natal province, South Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.