ArticleMovement ecology2026
Effects of topographic complexity on space-use by a key intertidal grazer in artificial environments.
Article in Movement ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe movement of animals in intertidal environments underpins community structure and is influenced by both abiotic and biotic factors within the environment. Whilst the effects of body size, tidal regime and temperature on the timing and ability of movement have been well-explored, physical features of the environment that generate complexity have received comparatively less attention. Given alterations to the topographic complexity of intertidal habitats associated with climate change and anthropogenic activities, understanding the effects of varying levels of topographic complexity on the movement of intertidal animals is critical to our understanding of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in these habitats going forward.
methodsWe experimentally manipulated topographic complexity using bespoke concrete panels at two scales, the individual panel and configuration of panels in a modelled 2 × 4 m area, to explore the effects of topographic complexity on the movement of a key intertidal gastropod and ecosystem engineer, the common limpet Patella vulgata. Using a combination of time-lapse photography and correlated random-walk modelling, we ‘scaled-up’ these experimental results to model the effects of topographic complexity on movement and space-use at landscape scales.
resultsResults revealed a significant effect of topographic complexity on limpet movement, with greater distances travelled on ‘intermediate’ topographic complexity surfaces (surface areas = 0.08 m2 and 0.09 m2), but more frequent, shorter movements on lowest topographic complexity (surface area = 0.06 m2). At landscape scales, panels with intermediate topographic complexity placed in random configurations at highest spatial cover induced the greatest path lengths of simulated limpets.
conclusionsThis study and its results represent the first experimental assessment of the direct effects of eco-engineered topographic complexity on the small-scale movements of intertidal gastropods and outline a first step towards the mechanistic extrapolation of results to heterogenous landscapes to explore the space-use of gastropods across larger spatial scales. With ongoing changes to intertidal environments resulting from climate change and anthropogenic activities, understanding how the movement of animals is impacted by variation in topographic complexity is essential to predicting future impacts on metapopulation dynamics and ecosystem functioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.