ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2026
Mammographic radiomics and breast density for predicting PD-L1 expression in breast cancer.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProgrammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a critical biomarker for guiding immunotherapy in breast cancer, particularly in triple-negative subtypes. However, conventional assessments rely on invasive biopsies and are limited by tumor heterogeneity. This study aims to develop a non-invasive approach for predicting PD-L1 expression using mammography-based radiomics features integrated with clinicopathological variables and breast density, and to evaluate its performance in both an internal development cohort and an independent external validation cohort.
methodsA total of 121 patients with breast cancer who underwent PD-L1 testing were retrospectively included, comprising 81 patients from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital (development cohort, April 2023–September 2024) and 40 patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University (external test cohort, January 2019–March 2025). Lesion regions of interest (ROIs) were manually annotated on both mediolateral oblique (MLO) and craniocaudal (CC) views for radiomic feature extraction using the SIMPACS Research platform. Additionally, standardized 1.5 cm × 1.5 cm ROIs were placed in the retroareolar parenchyma of both ipsilateral and contralateral breasts to evaluate background breast density. A multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifier was trained in the development cohort by combining lesion radiomic features, ipsilateral breast density radiomics, and clinicopathological variables, and then applied without recalibration to the external cohort. Performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score.
resultsIn the development cohort, the radiomic model incorporating clinicopathological information achieved an AUC of 0.610. When ipsilateral breast density was added, the AUC improved to 0.731. In contrast, the models with contralateral and bilateral density achieved lower AUCs of 0.535 and 0.537, respectively. In the independent external cohort, the final ipsilateral radiomics–clinical MLP model achieved an AUC of 0.629.
conclusionMammography-based radiomics models may offer a non-invasive approach to predicting PD-L1 expression in breast cancer. The inclusion of ipsilateral breast density improves predictive performance and could support individualized immunotherapy decision-making. The observed performance in an external cohort provides preliminary evidence of cross-institutional generalizability, while highlighting the need for further optimization and validation in larger multicenter studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.