Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
The minimally invasive approach for lateral malleolus fractures plating demonstrating less pain, shorter operative time and earlier discharge compared to open approach: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Full weight-bearing after geriatric ankle fractures-No problem?]Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOpen reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) has been a long-established and accepted technique for the treatment of lateral malleolar fractures. However, minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) may be preferred in cases with compromised soft tissue conditions or in the presence of comorbidities. MIPPO is increasingly being used in the treatment of long bone fractures. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical, functional and radiological outcomes of the MIPPO technique for lateral malleolus fractures with those of ORIF.
methodsThis prospective randomized controlled study analysed patients who underwent surgery for lateral malleolus fractures treated with ORIF or MIPPO between the years 2022 and 2024. The study included patients with lateral malleolus fractures of Danis-Weber types B and C requiring surgical intervention. Postoperative pain, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, hospital stay, surgical time, fluoroscopy time, and radiological measurements were compared.
resultsThe study included 68 patients (ORIF n = 34, MIPPO n = 34). The minimum follow-up for all the patients was 12 months and maximum was 24 months with a mean of 18,20 months postoperatively. The postoperative pain scores at 8 h (p = 0.001), 24 h (p < 0.001) and 2 weeks (p = 0.003) were lower in the MIPPO group. Pain scores were similar between the preoperative measurement and those observed at 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. AOFAS scores were similar between both groups at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Surgical time and the postoperative hospitalisation period were shorter in the MIPPO group (p < 0.001, p = 0.005). A higher level of fluoroscopy exposure was observed in the MIPPO group (p = 0.001). Similar results were obtained in radiological measurements between groups.
conclusionThe MIPPO technique leads to lower pain scores in the short term, shorter surgery times, and earlier discharge. In the long term, it provides similar clinical, functional, and radiological results to those obtained with ORIF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.