ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2026
Impact of carbon-based fibers morphologies on their carcinogenic potential.
Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dose-Response Relationships for Lung Tumor and Pleural Mesothelioma Induction by Repetitive Intratracheal Instillation of a Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube, MWCNT-7, in Rats: Comparison with Inhalation Carcinogenicity Based on Lung Burden.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Analysis of carbon fiber dust exposure status and related occupational health risk factors among workers during the molding process of carbon fiber products.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCarbon based fibers are considered to exhibit a carcinogenic potency when inhaled into the deep lung. Mesotheliomas develop after intraperitoneal application of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) exceeding a diameter of about 37 nm, whereas carcinogenic potency decreases for diameters below this threshold. While large MWCNT diameters are associated with a rigid fiber geometry, this study examined the effects of MWCNTs with smaller diameters ranging from 10 to 30 nm. Also, a sample of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) exhibiting single fiber diameters significantly below 10 nm and showing a flexible geometry was included since individual SWCNT fibers can aggregate to form bundles that exhibit increased rigidity. Additionally, the carcinogenic effect of pitch-based carbon fiber fragments was investigated. Carbon fibers are industrially produced with diameters larger than 4 µm and are thus not per se respirable. However, pitch-based fibers tend to break along their longitudinal axis, resulting in respirable fragments, partially of critical WHO dimensions. Four CNT samples with a geometric mean diameter (GMD) of 30 nm, 20 nm, 10 nm, and smaller than 10 nm, as well as one fragmented carbon fiber sample (GMD 1.3 µm) were intraperitoneally injected into rats in two dosages (0.1 × 10
resultsA small number of mesotheliomas occurred in all fiber types, but not at all dosages. For the carbon fiber material, a possible weak carcinogenic potency is seen at the higher dosage. For the SWCNT fiber, low number of mesotheliomas likewise suggest a weak carcinogenic potency. In the case of the MWCNT fiber with a GMD of 30 nm, very low number of mesotheliomas indicate a possible very weak carcinogenic potency. No clear carcinogenic potency was observed for the MWCNTs with GMDs of 20 nm and 10 nm.
conclusionsCarbon fiber fragments and thin but bundled MWCNTs showed weak carcinogenic potency. Non-bundled MWCNTs with a diameter below 30 nm did not show clearcarcinogenic potency at a dose up to 1 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.