ArticleMovement ecology2026
Miniaturized light-level geolocators provide novel insight into the migration ecology of an endangered songbird.
Article in Movement ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding songbird movements throughout their annual cycles is critical to inform conservation planning decisions and management priorities for migratory species. From 2017 to 2020, we attached miniaturized light-level geolocators to 309 male golden-cheeked warblers (Setophaga chrysoparia; hereafter warbler) at five study sites located across the species’ breeding range in Texas. From 2018 to 2021, we recovered data from 61 geolocators and used these data to determine the locations and timing of warbler movements during their non-breeding seasons and to quantify migratory connectivity and migration networks for the species. Mean duration of fall migration (37 d ±19 d) was longer than spring migration (27 d ±14 d), and, on average, second-year warblers initiated fall migration 10 d ±13 d earlier than after-second-year warblers. Migration initiation dates during spring, as well as duration and distance of fall and spring migrations, were similar for both age classes. Overall, 80% of warblers migrated along the Sierra Madre Oriental and Mexico’s Gulf coast between their breeding grounds in Texas and wintering grounds in southern Mexico and Central America during fall and spring; 20% migrated across or eastward around the Gulf of Mexico, primarily in fall. Overall, stopover duration varied along the warbler’s migration route (range = 3–61 d), with the longest stopovers in Texas and along the coast of Tamaulipas and Veracruz in Mexico. The highest percentages of stationary overwintering locations occurred in Chiapas, Mexico (27%), Guatemala (25%), and Honduras (17%), and many warblers used more than one location during winter. Some warblers used areas outside the predicted winter range; one extralimital location was confirmed during field-based surveys in Oaxaca, Mexico. Our results suggested that warblers exhibit weak migratory connectivity and likely disperse widely across the winter range. Given the narrow migration pathway used by most warblers and confined winter range in montane forests, continued and increased conservation along the warbler’s migration route and on the wintering grounds could help ensure population persistence and simultaneously protect co-occurring species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.