Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41654874›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

LGBTQ+ experiences of accessing NHS adult mental health services during COVID-19 in an area of North West England: a qualitative interview study.

Hayley J Lowther-Payne, Neil Caton, Keith Holt, Adelaide Beckwith, Anastasia Ushakova, Fiona Lobban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hayley J Lowther-PayneLancaster Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Health Innovation One, Lancaster University, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster, Lancashire, LA1 4AT, UK. h.j.lowther3@lancaster.ac.uk.
Neil CatonDivision of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Health Innovation Campus, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster, Lancashire, LA1 4AT, UK.
Keith HoltDepartment of Health Services Research, National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC NWC), University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
Adelaide BeckwithCentre for Applied Health Research, University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, M5 4WT, UK.
Anastasia UshakovaLancaster Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Health Innovation One, Lancaster University, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster, Lancashire, LA1 4AT, UK.
Fiona LobbanDivision of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Health Innovation Campus, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster, Lancashire, LA1 4AT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) people have a higher prevalence of mental health conditions than heterosexual and cisgender people, and report poor experiences of accessing mental health services. The COVID-19 pandemic may have had detrimental impacts on socially disadvantaged groups, such as LGBTQ+ people, and their mental healthcare access. This study aimed to understand LGBTQ+ experiences of mental health and accessing mental health services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsTopic-guided qualitative interviews were conducted with twelve LGBTQ+ people who accessed or tried to access NHS mental health services in an area of North West England between March 2020 and February 2022. Levesque’s Conceptual Framework for Healthcare Access was used as a framework to code the qualitative data. Reflexive thematic analysis was adopted to analyse the qualitative data from a critical realist perspective. Researchers with lived experience of being LGBTQ+ and accessing mental health services were embedded as part of the research team.

resultsEight themes across five domains of the framework were identified from the qualitative data. LGBTQ+ participants shared the negative impacts the pandemic had on their mental health (e.g., worsening existing mental health conditions, experiences of isolation, a loss of social connectedness with the LGBTQ+ community). LGBTQ+ participants experienced significant challenges accessing mental health services during COVID-19, associated with experiences of stigma and discrimination, concerns about disclosing their LGBTQ+ identity, living in unsupportive environments, and being unable to access mental health support remotely. Where positive experiences were identified, these highlighted important opportunities for change.

conclusionsThis study suggests that LGBTQ+ people may have been adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, with an increased risk of mental ill health and isolation, and poor experiences of accessing mental health services. Opportunities to maximise protective factors and improve timely access to mental health support are needed to mitigate these effects for LGBTQ+ people in the future. Recommendations to improve LGBTQ+ service inclusivity include implementing self-referral options, being more visibly LGBTQ+ inclusive, and improving staff knowledge and training on supporting LGBTQ+ service users.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health Services AccessibilityMental Health ServicesSexual and Gender MinoritiesAdultEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2State MedicineCOVID-19EnglandHealthcare accessInequalitiesLGBTQ+Mental health servicesQualitative

Identifiers

PMID41654874
PMCPMC12977796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.