ArticleJournal of intensive care2026
Fentanyl as an induction agent for tracheal intubation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTracheal intubation in critically ill adults is frequently complicated by severe physiological adverse events, particularly cardiovascular instability. Although fentanyl is commonly used for induction, observational data suggest that its use may increase the risk of post-intubation hypotension. However, the overall randomized evidence remains unclear. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we hypothesized that induction regimens including fentanyl or its analogs would increase the risk of peri-intubation cardiovascular instability in critically ill patients.
methodsWe comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO ICTRP from inception through October 31, 2025. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing an induction regimen including fentanyl or its analogs with one without them in critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation. The primary outcome was peri-intubation cardiovascular instability. Secondary outcomes included peri-intubation hypoxemia, successful intubation on the first attempt, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, and mortality. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for all outcomes. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted for the primary outcome. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.
resultsWe included five RCTs and 515 participants. Two studies were judged to be low risk of bias, two raised some concerns, and one was at high risk of bias. Comparators included various induction agents and placebo. Definitions of peri-intubation cardiovascular instability also varied. The evidence was very uncertain regarding the effect of fentanyl on the risk of peri-intubation cardiovascular instability (risk ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-2.40; risk difference, 9.2% more; 95% confidence interval, 3.8% fewer to 31.3% more; very low certainty). In TSA, the required information size (n = 5586) was not reached, indicating the lack of statistical power. The certainty of evidence for pooled secondary outcomes was generally low or very low.
conclusionsThe effect of fentanyl on peri-intubation cardiovascular instability remains highly uncertain, with pooled estimates compatible with substantial harm, substantial benefit, or no effect. Current randomized evidence is insufficient to guide routine clinical practice, given their very low or low certainty and susceptibility to random error.
trial registrationPROSPERO (registration number: CRD420251241214).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.