Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41654845›Full record

ArticleTrials2026

Combination of 0.09% cyclosporine and intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy for the treatment of dry eye disease in symptomatic contact lens wearers: study protocol for a sham-controlled randomized clinical trial.

Eric Lortie-Milner, Langis Michaud, Marie-France Dubois, Patrick Boissy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06392438 (Combination of 0.09% Cyclosporine and Intense Pulsed Light), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06392438 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Combination of 0.09% Cyclosporine and Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) Therapy for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease in Symptomatic Contact Lens Wearers: a Sham-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversité de SherbrookeRan2024 to 2025Enrolled44ConditionsDry Eye, Contact Lens ComplicationArmsCycloSPORINE Ophthalmic, Intense Pulsed Light, Sham Intense Pulse Light
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric Lortie-MilnerFaculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12 eAvenue Nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada.
Langis MichaudÉcole d'optométrie, Université de Montréal, 3744 rue Jean-Brillant, Montréal, QC, H3T 1P1, Canada.
Marie-France DuboisFaculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12 eAvenue Nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada.
Patrick BoissyFaculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12 eAvenue Nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada. patrick.boissy@usherbrooke.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6582-4519

Funding

Canadian Consortium of clinical trials training 851440Mitacs IT37850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiscomfort while using soft contact lenses is a major concern in eyecare, and it is strongly linked to dry eye. Many new dry eye therapies have not yet been studied on contact lens users. Cyclosporine is a pharmaceutical agent that has recently been re-engineered in a nanomicellar drop. Intense pulsed light is a potent treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction. Very little data exists on the effects of these treatments, and they have never been tested in combination. The aim of this study was to test the effects of the combination of nanomicellar cyclosporine and intense pulsed light on the symptoms and signs of soft contact lens users.

methodsForty-four symptomatic soft contact lens users will be recruited from a primary care optometry practice. They will receive cyclosporine 0.09% to use twice daily, and, after 8 weeks, they will be randomized to receive three sessions of intense pulsed light or a sham. Primary outcome will be the symptom score using a questionnaire, and secondary outcomes will include tear film stability measurements (both on the tear film and over contact lenses), tear meniscus height, osmolarity, meibomian gland atrophy, and ocular surface staining. Safety will be assessed by measuring visual acuity, intra-ocular pressure, and an adverse effects questionnaire. Questionnaire scores will be compared using a t-test, while other measurements will be analyzed using mixed-model effects. DISCUSSION: This study aims to test whether a combination of novel dry eye treatments that target the whole tear film improves comfort while wearing contact lenses. Discomfort is a major issue that leads to drop out. The results of this study could provide eyecare professionals with additional tools to help their patients and could open the discussion on future solutions to improve contact lens users' experience.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06392438 , registered on April 23rd, 2024.

Indexed as

Contact Lenses, HydrophilicCyclosporineDry Eye SyndromesIntense Pulsed Light TherapyAdministration, OphthalmicAdultCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMaleOphthalmic SolutionsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesTearsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCyclosporineOphthalmic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID41654845
PMCPMC12977451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.