Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41654817›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2026

Advanced deep learning techniques for classifying dental conditions using panoramic X-ray images.

Alireza Golkarieh, Bahareh Afjehsoleymani, Kiana Kiashemshaki, Sajjad Rezvani Boroujeni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alireza GolkariehDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-9554-8521
Bahareh AfjehsoleymaniDepartment of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. bahar.afjehsoleymany@gmail.com.
Kiana KiashemshakiDepartment of Computer Science, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-5055-5552
Sajjad Rezvani BoroujeniDepartment of Applied Statistics & Operations Research, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-5454-0864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study evaluated multiple deep learning approaches for automated classification of dental conditions in panoramic radiographs, comparing custom convolutional neural networks (CNNs), hybrid CNN-machine learning models, and fine-tuned pre-trained architectures, comparing the performance of custom convolutional neural networks (CNNs), hybrid CNN-machine learning models, and fine-tuned pre-trained architectures for detecting fillings, cavities, implants, and impacted teeth.

methodsA dataset of 1,512 panoramic X-ray images with 11,137 manually annotated bounding boxes for four dental conditions (fillings, cavities, implants, and impacted teeth) was analyzed, with regions of interest extracted using expert annotations for subsequent AI-based classification. Class imbalance was addressed through random downsampling, creating a balanced dataset of 894 samples per condition. Multiple approaches were evaluated via 5-fold cross-validation: a custom CNN, hybrid models combining CNN features with traditional classifiers (Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, Random Forest), and fine-tuned pre-trained networks (VGG16, Xception, ResNet50). Performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics.

resultsThe hybrid CNN-Random Forest model achieved the highest accuracy of 85.4 ± 2.3% with macro-F1 score of 0.843 ± 0.028, representing an 11% point improvement over the custom CNN (74.29% accuracy, 0.724 macro-F1). VGG16 demonstrated superior pre-trained architecture performance (82.3 ± 2.0% accuracy, 0.817 macro-F1), followed by Xception (80.9 ± 2.3%) and ResNet50 (79.5 ± 2.7%). CNN + Random Forest exhibited exceptional fillings detection (F1: 0.860 ± 0.033) with balanced multi-class performance. Systematic misclassifications between morphologically similar conditions revealed inherent diagnostic challenges.

conclusionHybrid CNN-based approaches combining feature extraction with Random Forest classification provide superior discriminative capability for dental condition detection on manually annotated regions compared to standalone architectures. While computationally efficient hybrid models show promise as supportive diagnostic tools, observed misclassification patterns indicate these AI systems should serve as adjuncts to clinical expertise, requiring prospective validation studies.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadiography, PanoramicClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansRandom ForestSupport Vector MachineConvolutional neural networks (CNN)Dental conditionsDental diagnosticsDental x-ray classificationPanoramic radiographs

Identifiers

PMID41654817
PMCPMC12977708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.