ArticleBMC nursing2026
Contextualising ventilation decisions: an ethnographic study of factors shaping interprofessional decision-making.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVentilation is a core domain of intensive care, and decisions about its management are frequent, complex, and involve multiple professions. While professional responsibilities in such decisions have been examined, little is known about the contextual factors that shape ventilation-related decision-making and the distribution of responsibilities among professional groups. This study aims to identify and analyse such factors.
methodsAn ethnography was conducted in two German ICUs between December 2023 and July 2025. Data comprised 97 h of observation and 17 episodic interviews with nurses and physicians. Analysis followed the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL).
resultsVentilation-related decision work was shaped by a constellation of interdependent contextual factors. These factors were organised in an analytic heuristic structured by level (system, unit, actor) and dimension (structural, situational). In exploring five factors in greater depth – experience, ‘significant others’, rounds, ‘bed shortage’, and the pandemic – the analysis illustrates how contextual conditions interact across levels to shape both responsibilities and processes of decision-making in everyday ICU practice.
conclusionsVentilation-related decision work in ICUs is embedded in and shaped by multiple interacting contextual conditions. By providing an analytic heuristic to organise and relate these factors, this study offers a structured perspective for understanding how context shapes ventilation-related decision work in everyday practice and provides a basis for further research, education, and reflective practice. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.