ArticleBMC public health2026
Nationwide analysis of demographic and socioeconomic inequities in air pollution exposure in Korea, 2006-2019.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAir pollution is a significant global health challenge, yet few studies have examined how the effects of exposure to environmental pollutants vary across demographic and socioeconomic groups. This study aims to investigate the distribution of air pollutants by demographics and socioeconomic status (SES), accounting for individual monthly residential mobility.
methodsIndividual annual exposures were estimated by linking monthly residential addresses to air pollutant concentrations modeled using the Community Multiscale Air Quality system. Particulate matter (≤ 10 μm, PM₁₀), nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), and ozone (O₃) from 2006 to 2019 were linked to demographic and SES indicators from the Korean National Health Insurance Service for approximately 50 million individuals annually. Exposure disparities across socioeconomic groups were assessed using ANOVA, eta-squared statistics, and generalized estimating equations.
resultsFrom 2006 to 2019, overall exposures to PM₁₀ and NO₂ declined, whereas O₃ levels increased. PM₁₀ (50.18 µg/m³) and NO₂ (25.01 ppb) concentrations were highest in adults aged 30–34 years, decreasing with age to 47.42 µg/m³ and 22.06 ppb among those aged ≥ 65 years. Conversely, O₃ exposure was lowest in the 25–29-year age group (37.58 ppb) and increased to 39.38 ppb in those aged ≥ 65 years. Eligible individuals (medical aid recipients) had the lowest exposures to PM₁₀ (45.15 µg/m³) and NO₂ (20.12 ppb) but the highest O₃ exposure (40.30 ppb). In the insured populations, self-employed individuals showed higher PM₁₀ and NO₂ exposures compared to employee-insured individuals. Higher SES groups were more likely to be in the highest tertile for PM₁₀ and NO₂ exposure (40.5% of highest-SES self-employed vs. 28.9% of lowest-SES in the high NO₂ tertile), while lower SES groups showed higher O₃ exposure. Spatially, PM₁₀ and NO₂ levels were higher in urban areas, whereas O₃ levels were elevated in rural areas.
conclusionSES and demographics intersect to create distinct, pollutant-specific exposure patterns in Korea, contrasting with Western countries where lower-SES groups typically experience higher pollution exposure. By accounting for individual residential mobility, this study provides improved exposure estimates and highlights the importance of considering socioeconomic context in evaluating pollution-related health effects and developing targeted environmental policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.