ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Radiography-based AI decision support for further post-traumatic knee MRI referral in children.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of our systematic work was to investigate an artificial intelligence-based prediction of relevant internal injuries of the paediatric knee joint based on initial radiographs and to develop a corresponding AI model.
methodsWe queried the hospital information systems of two independent sites for pediatric and adolescent patients up to the age of 19 years with a history of recent trauma, who had undergone a radiograph at ap and lateral projections and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the same knee joint within 48 hours. After exclusion of patients due to postoperative situations, tumorous or infectious diseases, missing and invalid radiographs, 873 patients with 1746 total images were included. Each model was assessed for precision, recall, accuracy and the F1 score, revealing variation between model versions in performance metrics.
resultsThe averaged performance across all EfficientNet models achieved a precision of 0.7340, recall of 0.7181, accuracy of 0.7131, and 0.7260. The best per- forming model, EfficientNet-B5, achieved an average precision of 0.7445, recall for 0.7890, and accuracy for 0.7450, respectively. The heat maps revealed significant concentrations of pathologies detected by AI primarily in the femoral and tibial condyles. AI also identified fractures and microtrabecular fractures, suggesting their effectiveness in identifying relevant injuries on (pediatric) knee radiograph.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.