ArticleGenes & nutrition2026
Effect of gene-based vs. standard weight-loss recommendations on anthropometry, lipid and glucose markers, and dietary intake: a randomized controlled trial (the MyGeneMyDiet
Article in Genes & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05098899 (Interventions Using Genomics-based Strategies), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Interventions Using Genomics-based Strategies (InGeSt) Towards Enhanced Nutrition Recommendations: A Proof-of-concept RCT for the DNA-based Nutrition and Lifestyle Recommendations in Overweight and Obese Filipino Adults
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Beyond One-Size-Fits-All: Individually Tailored Dietary Interventions in Modern Obesity Care.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Toward standardized personalized nutrition: a methodological scoping review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in adults with overweight and obesity.Genes & nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGene-based nutrition recommendations have emerged as a strategy for weight management, but evidence of their added value over standard advice remains inconclusive. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of MyGeneMyDiet®, a genotype-informed lifestyle program, compared with standard recommendations on anthropometric, biochemical, and dietary outcomes in Filipino adults with overweight and obesity over 12 months.
methodsIn this randomized controlled trial, participants received either MyGeneMyDiet® or standard recommendation (control). Both groups underwent regular nutrition counseling during the active phase (months 0–6) before transitioning to an inactive phase (free-living conditions, months 6–12). Primary outcomes included weight, BMI, waist circumference, and body fat percentage; secondary outcomes were dietary intake and biochemical markers. Analyses were conducted according to randomized group assignment. Primary analyses used available case-data at each timepoint, with paired t-tests for within-group comparisons and ANCOVA for between-group differences. Sensitivity analyses used Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) and Inverse Probability of Attrition Weighting (IPAW) to address loss-to-follow-up.
resultsOf the 136 screened, 52 initiated the intervention (MyGeneMyDiet®, n = 29; standard recommendation, n = 23), and 27 completed the 12-month follow-up (MyGeneMyDiet®, n = 15; standard recommendation, n = 12). Both groups lost weight over 12 months, with no evidence of meaningful between-group differences. During the 6-month active phase, baseline-adjusted analyses showed no significant between-group differences in weight (-0.36 kg [95% CI: -1.77, 1.04]), BMI (0.11 kg/m2 [95% CI: -0.51, 0.73]), waist circumference (-0.27 cm [95% CI: -2.23, 1.69]), or body fat percentage (0.92% [95% CI: -0.86, 1.05]). These trends persisted through 12 months. Both groups reported reductions in energy intake; within-group decreases in energy and macronutrients were observed in the MyGeneMyDiet® arm at month 12, but these did not translate into superior anthropometric or metabolic outcomes.
conclusionsWe found no evidence of meaningful differences between gene-based and standard recommendations in anthropometric or metabolic outcomes over 12 months. While genotype-informed counseling was associated with reported reductions in dietary intake at some timepoints, these changes did not translate into superior clinical outcomes. These findings suggest that genetic tailoring alone may not enhance long-term weight management beyond standard counseling but offer insight into the feasibility of integrating gene-based recommendations in low- and middle-income country settings. CLINICAL
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT05098899 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05098899 ); registered 20 October 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.