Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2026
Long-term growth effects of post-discharge formula in moderate-to-late preterm infants: follow-up at 24 months corrected age of a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundModerate-to-late preterm (MLP) infants (i.e., <37 weeks' gestation) are at risk for suboptimal neonatal nutrition and growth. We compared anthropometry and body composition at 24 months corrected age (CA; i.e., after term equivalent age (TEA)) between MLP infants fed either an isocaloric, protein- and mineral-enriched post-discharge formula (PDF) or standard term formula (STF) between TEA and 6 months CA.
methodsAfter enrollment (≤7 d postpartum), MLP infants received PDF if (fortified) mother's own milk was insufficient. At TEA, those receiving >25% of intake as formula were randomized to either continue the same PDF or switch to STF until 6 months CA. At 24 months CA, anthropometry was assessed and air-displacement plethysmography was used to estimate body composition.
resultsFrom the original study (n = 157), only 64 infants had anthropometry assessed and 34 infants had body composition estimated at 24 months CA. At the follow-up visit, PDF-fed infants had slightly larger head circumference compared to STF-fed infants (49.0 ± 1.5 and 48.3 ± 1.5 cm, p < 0.05). Despite similar total body weight at 24 months CA, PDF-fed infants had lower fat mass and higher fat-free mass compared to STF-fed infants (fat mass: 2392 ± 923 and 3615 ± 1359 g; fat-free mass: 10461 ± 1030 and 10108 ± 1700 g; respectively, p < 0.05).
conclusionsProviding MLP infants with PDF for 6 months after TEA was associated with lower fat mass and higher fat-free mass, with similar bodyweights at 24 months CA compared to those fed STF. Our findings should be interpreted cautiously, due to high loss-to-follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41654679What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.