ArticleScientific reports2026
Analysis of interception problems in donning and doffing personal protective equipment in a large cabin hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic: a real world study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although proper donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE) is critical for infection prevention, detailed characterization of problems encountered during these processes in real-world settings during large-scale infectious disease outbreaks remains insufficient. This study aimed to analyze the characteristics and distribution of interception problems in the process of donning and doffing process in a large cabin hospital during the 2022 COVID-19 pandemic in Shanghai. A prospective, real-world study was designed to collect and analyze data on irregularities observed during personal protective equipment (PPE) donning procedures in cabin hospital operations. The proportion of problems encountered during donning PPE was 5.29% (246/4,652), while during doffing PPE, it was 8.44% (382/4,525) (P < 0.001). The primary problem during donning PPE was related to problems with protective clothing, followed by problems with respirators. There was no significant difference in problem distribution among different posts (P = 0.459). The problems related to protective clothing mainly focused on loose fitting around the head and neck, making them prone to exposure during donning (56.25%, 99/176) and contamination of the inner surface of protective clothing during doffing (46.43%, 91/196). Respirator-related problems included failure of the seal test during donning PPE (61.54%, 24/39) and shifting or loosening of the respirator during PPE doffing (73.68%, 14/19). These findings identify critical gaps in PPE procedures and highlight the need for targeted training to address these issues, thereby reducing the risk of infection among healthcare personnel in mobile cabin hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.