ReviewArchives of toxicology2026
Dietary phosphate exposure-strategies to protect vulnerable population groups.
Review in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Hidden Burden of Water-Binding Additives in Meat Products: Biochemical, Clinical, and Psychosocial Implications.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2026Review
- Mind the Gut: Cognitive Decline, Microbiota, and Nutrition-Related Modulators in Older Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease.Nutrients · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phosphorus is commonly part of the diets in developed countries, both as a natural component of protein-rich foods and as a food additive. Consumption of food containing high amounts of phosphate as a food additive has continued to rise over time, resulting in increasing dietary exposure to phosphate. In 2019, an evaluation of phosphoric acid and phosphates conducted by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) identified young populations as groups with exposures exceeding the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI), and also raised concern that the current ADI may not be sufficiently protective for individuals with an impaired renal function, which may account for 10% of the general population. The Senate Commission on Food Safety (SKLM) of the German Research Foundation (DFG) critically reviewed the safety of dietary phosphate, with a particular focus on the kidney as the primary target organ, taking into account the occurrence and content of phosphate in food, the most recent exposure estimates, the bioavailability of phosphate from different sources, the evidence linking excessive phosphate intake to kidney damage in animal models and humans as well as the exceedance of the current ADI in children. Moreover, the SKLM identified data gaps and research needs that should be addressed to improve the risk assessment of phosphate, with a special focus on vulnerable population groups. Based on the presented evidence, the Commission concludes that excessive dietary phosphate intake warrants further attention regarding possible health effects in vulnerable population groups or at exposure levels exceeding the ADI. Finally, the SKLM suggests a battery of risk management measures to reduce dietary exposure to phosphate, particularly in infants, toddlers and children, and to protect patients with chronic renal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.