ArticleScientific reports2026
DermaGPT a federated multimodal framework with a meta learned trust function for interpretable dermatology diagnostics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Fine-Tuning, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Hybrid Adaptation of Language Models for Clinical Decision-Making in Health Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in generative and federated artificial intelligence enable privacy-aware diagnostic systems that integrate multimodal reasoning and explainability. This work introduces DermaGPT, a federated multimodal framework for dermatology decision support that emphasizes trustworthy use under heterogeneous, privacy-sensitive data. The system combines a PaLI-Gemma 2 vision–language backbone, fine-tuned with low-rank adaptation, with a retrieval-augmented large language model that generates clinically coherent and patient-friendly explanations. To improve robustness and calibration across sites, a meta-learned trust function (MLTF) dynamically re-weights client updates based on uncertainty, calibration, and domain-shift indicators. Evaluated on four institutional datasets and an external cohort of 4,452 biopsy-confirmed clinical and dermoscopic images, DermaGPT achieved 90.2% diagnostic accuracy across 11 lesion types and 93.3% accuracy in malignancy prediction, with well-calibrated outputs under federated training. Expert dermatologists rated its explanations as clear and clinically relevant; these ratings were obtained on class-level canonical exemplars rather than per-image reports. In our deployment threat model, images are processed locally by the vision module; when a third-party LLM is used, only text (a short diagnostic summary and the user question) is transmitted, which may still be considered sensitive health data. Taken together, these results indicate that a trust-aware, federated multimodal design can deliver interpretable, efficient, and privacy-aware dermatology decision support that is intended to augment rather than replace clinician judgment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.