Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41654555›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Risk maps for urban fire with geospatial model-based framework.

Ke Wu, Sha Lu, Yishuo Jiang, Ming Chen, Jianing Luo, Liping Jiang, Tianhang Zhang, Yuxin Zhang, Xinyan Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ke WuKey Laboratory of Offshore Geotechnics and Material of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Sha LuKey Laboratory of Offshore Geotechnics and Material of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yishuo JiangDepartment of Systems Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA.
Ming ChenResearch Center for Urban Fire Safety Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jianing LuoSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China.
Liping JiangFire Rescue Brigade of Xiaoshan District, Xiaoshan, China.
Tianhang ZhangKey Laboratory of Offshore Geotechnics and Material of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. thz@zju.edu.cn.
Yuxin ZhangDept. of Building Environment and Energy Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Xinyan HuangDept. of Building Environment and Energy Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China. xy.huang@polyu.edu.hk.

Funding

HK Research Grants Council Theme-based Research Scheme T22-505/19-NNational Natural Science Foundation of China 52478422Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF GZC20241518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate identification of urban fire spatial patterns and governing factors is critical for optimizing firefighting resource allocation and developing sustainable cities resilient to evolving risks. Identifying spatial patterns of urban fires depends critically on the scale at which clustering is analyzed, yet a systematic approach to determine this optimal scale remains lacking. Moreover, the quantitative influence of fine-grained land-use structure on fire occurrence is not well understood. To overcome these gaps, this study proposes a novel three-stage framework for constructing hierarchical urban fire risk maps conditioned on built-environment macrostructure: (1) Investigation and selection of influencing factors, innovatively introducing high-resolution urban land-use attributes as variables, alongside traditional factors such as population density and socioeconomic indicators; (2) Determination of optimal grid size by integrating two key indicators: the Moran’s Index and Silhouette Score, ensuring precise spatial clustering. Subsequently, the spatial autocorrelation of urban fires is quantified; and (3) Negative binomial regression-driven risk quantification, deriving factor weights to calculate cell-level risk scores and generate hierarchical risk levels. Finally, a case study is conducted using fire data from Xiaoshan, China, a typical urban district with a population of about 2 million, covering 4,967 incidents from 2020 to 2023. The fire risk map indicates that urban fire distribution demonstrates striking conformity to the 80/20 rule, with a small share of cells concentrating most of the risk. This methodology provides stable, actionable risk mapping for strategic fire resource deployment and urban planning.

Indexed as

Fire risk managementRegressionSpatial autocorrelationUrban fire riskUrban planning

Identifiers

PMID41654555
PMCPMC12946170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.